AMIR KHAN vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS — WRIA/870/2026

Disposed: -- on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 27-Jan-2026

CNR: UPHC010232782026

Filing Number

WRIA/

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

WRIA/870/2026

Registration Date

20-Jan-2026

Judge

Vikas Budhwar

Coram

Vikas Budhwar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WRIT PETITIONS RELATING TO STATE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES (SINGLE BENCH) ( 11500 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMIR KHAN

    Adv. RAFEEK AHMAD KHAN,RAMESH CHANDRA,RAMESH CHANDRA, ,RAMESH CHANDRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

    Adv. ,C.S.C. 1123

  2. 2.COLLECTOR MAHOBA

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

    Adv. C.S.C.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    —

    Vikas Budhwar

  3. 18-Feb-2026

    Vikas BudhwarView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad adjourned Amir Khan's writ petition multiple times (27.01.2026, 05.02.2026, and 18.02.2026) while directing the State of U.P. to clarify whether a charge sheet was served and to provide instructions. The Court warned that if instructions are not produced by 09.03.2026, the District Collector and Development Officer of Mahoba must appear in person. No substantive decision on merits was rendered; the case remains pending in adjournment stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    —

    Vikas Budhwar

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Vikas BudhwarView PDF

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    Vikas BudhwarView PDF

  8. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIA/870/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad adjourned Amir Khan's writ petition multiple times (27.01.2026, 05.02.2026, and 18.02.2026) while directing the State of U.P. to clarify whether a charge sheet was served and to provide instructions. The Court warned that if instructions are not produced by 09.03.2026, the District Collector and Development Officer of Mahoba must appear in person. No substantive decision on merits was rendered; the case remains pending in adjournment stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case