DHARMVEER vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A. — CRLA/502/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 307,43-307. Next hearing: 01st January 1900.

Next hearing 01-Jan-1900

CNR: UPHC010230032026

Filing Number

CRLA/

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRLA/502/2026

Registration Date

15-Jan-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )

Sub-Category

Judgment in the matter relating to any other office mentioned in Indian Penal Code not covered in above categories. ( 85 )

Judicial Branch

Crl. Appeals

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 307,43-307
Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act Section 27,4-27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHARMVEER

    Adv. ATUL KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. 01-Jan-1900

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Feb-2026

    —

    Raj Beer Singh

  3. 17-Feb-2026

    —

    Raj Beer Singh

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    Raj Beer SinghView PDF

    Summary of CRLA 502/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad allowed Dharmveer's application for suspension of sentence and bail during the pendency of his criminal appeal. Dharmveer, convicted under Sections 307/34 IPC and 25/27 Arms Act with a maximum five-year sentence, has already served over four years in custody. The court, considering the substantial period of incarceration and case pendency, granted bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties. Realization of 50% fine was stayed during appeal pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 21-Jan-2026

    Raj Beer SinghView PDF

  7. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/502/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRLA 502/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad allowed Dharmveer's application for suspension of sentence and bail during the pendency of his criminal appeal. Dharmveer, convicted under Sections 307/34 IPC and 25/27 Arms Act with a maximum five-year sentence, has already served over four years in custody. The court, considering the substantial period of incarceration and case pendency, granted bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties. Realization of 50% fine was stayed during appeal pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case