RINKU YADAV vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS — WRIB/156/2026

Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 20-Jan-2026

CNR: UPHC010222892026

Filing Number

WRIB/

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

WRIB/156/2026

Registration Date

14-Jan-2026

Judge

Dinesh Pathak

Coram

Dinesh Pathak

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONSOLIDATION OF HOLDINGS ( 100100 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RINKU YADAV

    Adv. SHIV CHAND YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

    Adv. ,C.S.C. 1123

  2. 2.SETTLEMENT OFFICER, CONSOLIDATION, TEHSIL- MARTINGANJ

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, PHOOLPUR

    Adv. C.S.C.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Dinesh PathakView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad granted Rinku Yadav's writ petition seeking expeditious disposal of a consolidation case pending before the Consolidation Officer, Phoolpur. The court directed the officer to decide Case No. 1197 of 2025 under Section 12 of the U.P. Consolidation Act 1953 within twelve months by issuing a reasoned order after providing hearing opportunities, without unnecessary adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Dinesh Pathak

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Dinesh Pathak

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Anish Kumar Gupta

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 20-Jan-2026

    Kshitij ShailendraView PDF

  8. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIB/156/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad granted Rinku Yadav's writ petition seeking expeditious disposal of a consolidation case pending before the Consolidation Officer, Phoolpur. The court directed the officer to decide Case No. 1197 of 2025 under Section 12 of the U.P. Consolidation Act 1953 within twelve months by issuing a reasoned order after providing hearing opportunities, without unnecessary adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case