SMT NEETA DEVI vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,RAJKUMAR VERMA,RAJESH KUMAR RAKESH — BAILC/20/2026
Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC010221072026
Filing Number
BAILC/
Filing Date
13-Jan-2026
Registration No
BAILC/20/2026
Registration Date
17-Jan-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
BAILC MAJOR ( 71 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT NEETA DEVI
Adv. RAM ASHISH PANDEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,RAJKUMAR VERMA,RAJESH KUMAR RAKESH
-
2.HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICE COMMITTEE
Adv. RAJESH KUMAR RAKESH RAJKUMAR VERMA
-
3.CHILD WELFARE SCOMMITTEE
Adv. RAJESH KUMAR RAKESH RAJKUMAR VERMA
-
4.PRADEEP KUMAR
Adv. RAJESH KUMAR RAKESH RAJKUMAR VERMA
Case History
-
25-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-May-2026
—
Krishan Pahal
-
18-May-2026
—
Krishan Pahal
-
11-May-2026
—
Sameer Jain
-
04-May-2026
—
Krishan Pahal
-
23-Apr-2026
—
Krishan Pahal
-
09-Apr-2026
—
Krishan Pahal
-
02-Apr-2026
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
19-Mar-2026
Dr. Gautam ChowdharyView PDF
Case Summary: In Criminal Misc. Bail Cancellation Application No. 20 of 2026, the Allahabad High Court (Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary, J.) adjourned the case to April 2, 2026. The applicant Smt Neeta Devi was granted two weeks to file a supplementary affidavit in response to the bail cancellation proceedings against the State of U.P. and three others. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jan-2026
Dr. Gautam ChowdharyView PDF
-
13-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BAILC/20/2026
Case Summary: In Criminal Misc. Bail Cancellation Application No. 20 of 2026, the Allahabad High Court (Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary, J.) adjourned the case to April 2, 2026. The applicant Smt Neeta Devi was granted two weeks to file a supplementary affidavit in response to the bail cancellation proceedings against the State of U.P. and three others. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts