THAKUR PRASAD AND OTHERS RAMA NAND PANDEY, PRADEEP NARAIN PANDEY vs STATE OF U.P. — CRLA/4455/2002

Disposed: -- on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Oct-2002

CNR: UPHC010196582002

Filing Number

CRLA/4455/2002

Filing Date

09-Oct-2002

Registration No

CRLA/4455/2002

Registration Date

09-Oct-2002

Judge

Vani Ranjan Agrawal

Coram

Vani Ranjan Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )

Sub-Category

Judgment in the matter relating to any other office mentioned in Indian Penal Code not covered in above categories. ( 85 )

Judicial Branch

Crl. Appeals

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 22-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THAKUR PRASAD AND OTHERS RAMA NAND PANDEY, PRADEEP NARAIN PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Vani Ranjan AgrawalView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad dismissed the criminal appeal filed by Thakur Prasad and others, confirming the trial court's conviction under Sections 147 and 323/149 IPC. The appellants' six-month probation period had elapsed with compliance to conditions, and the court found the trial court's lenient approach of releasing them on probation rather than imprisonment to be a plausible view requiring no interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Vani Ranjan Agrawal

  4. 01-Dec-2025

    Vani Ranjan Agrawal

  5. 01-Aug-2025

    Manoj Bajaj

  6. 17-May-2025

    Manoj Bajaj

  7. 10-Mar-2025

    Manoj Bajaj

  8. 08-Jan-2025

    Manju Rani Chauhan

  9. 21-Sep-2024

    Nalin Kumar Srivastava

  10. 13-Sep-2024

    Nalin Kumar Srivastava

  11. 08-Aug-2024

    Nalin Kumar SrivastavaView PDF

  12. 04-Mar-2024

    Siddharth , Vinod Diwakar

  13. 10-Oct-2002

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 09-Oct-2002

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/4455/2002

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad dismissed the criminal appeal filed by Thakur Prasad and others, confirming the trial court's conviction under Sections 147 and 323/149 IPC. The appellants' six-month probation period had elapsed with compliance to conditions, and the court found the trial court's lenient approach of releasing them on probation rather than imprisonment to be a plausible view requiring no interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case