THAKUR PRASAD AND OTHERS RAMA NAND PANDEY, PRADEEP NARAIN PANDEY vs STATE OF U.P. — CRLA/4455/2002
Disposed: -- on 10th April 2026.
CNR: UPHC010196582002
Filing Number
CRLA/4455/2002
Filing Date
09-Oct-2002
Registration No
CRLA/4455/2002
Registration Date
09-Oct-2002
Judge
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
Coram
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )
Sub-Category
Judgment in the matter relating to any other office mentioned in Indian Penal Code not covered in above categories. ( 85 )
Judicial Branch
Crl. Appeals
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 22-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THAKUR PRASAD AND OTHERS RAMA NAND PANDEY, PRADEEP NARAIN PANDEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Vani Ranjan AgrawalView PDF
The High Court of Allahabad dismissed the criminal appeal filed by Thakur Prasad and others, confirming the trial court's conviction under Sections 147 and 323/149 IPC. The appellants' six-month probation period had elapsed with compliance to conditions, and the court found the trial court's lenient approach of releasing them on probation rather than imprisonment to be a plausible view requiring no interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
—
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
-
01-Dec-2025
—
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
-
01-Aug-2025
—
Manoj Bajaj
-
17-May-2025
—
Manoj Bajaj
-
10-Mar-2025
—
Manoj Bajaj
-
08-Jan-2025
—
Manju Rani Chauhan
-
21-Sep-2024
—
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
-
13-Sep-2024
—
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
-
08-Aug-2024
Nalin Kumar SrivastavaView PDF
-
04-Mar-2024
—
Siddharth , Vinod Diwakar
-
10-Oct-2002
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Oct-2002
Case filed
Registration No. CRLA/4455/2002
The High Court of Allahabad dismissed the criminal appeal filed by Thakur Prasad and others, confirming the trial court's conviction under Sections 147 and 323/149 IPC. The appellants' six-month probation period had elapsed with compliance to conditions, and the court found the trial court's lenient approach of releasing them on probation rather than imprisonment to be a plausible view requiring no interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts