MOHAMMAD AMIR vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — CRLR/236/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 188,43-188. Next hearing: 18th May 2026.

Next hearing 18-May-2026

CNR: UPHC010182432026

Filing Number

CRLR/

Filing Date

12-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRLR/236/2026

Registration Date

15-Jan-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

REVISION ( 401300 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Last updated 22-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 188,43-188

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMAD AMIR

    Adv. MOHAMMAD ZAFAR YAB KHAN,SHAHROZE KHAN,SHAHROZE KHAN, ,SHAHROZE KHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SAMEER SINGH, INCHARGE INSPECTOR

Case History

  1. 18-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-May-2026

    —

    Subhash Chandra Sharma

  3. 11-May-2026

    —

    Achal Sachdev

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Achal SachdevView PDF

    In Criminal Revision No. 236 of 2026 at Allahabad High Court, Mohammad Amir's petition was called on April 7, 2026, but neither the petitioner nor respondent's counsel appeared. The court adjourned the case to be listed in the ordinary course, with only the State's A.G.A. present during the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    —

    Subhash Chandra Sharma

  6. 31-Mar-2026

    —

    Subhash Chandra Sharma

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    —

    Harvir Singh

  8. 17-Mar-2026

    —

    Harvir Singh

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    —

    Abdul Shahid

  10. 24-Feb-2026

    —

    Lakshmi Kant Shukla

  11. 17-Feb-2026

    —

    Abdul Shahid

  12. 10-Feb-2026

    —

    Abdul Shahid

  13. 03-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 21-Jan-2026

    Abdul ShahidView PDF

  15. 12-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLR/236/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In Criminal Revision No. 236 of 2026 at Allahabad High Court, Mohammad Amir's petition was called on April 7, 2026, but neither the petitioner nor respondent's counsel appeared. The court adjourned the case to be listed in the ordinary course, with only the State's A.G.A. present during the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case