COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT, CHAUDHRY T.D.S. INTER COLLEGE vs STATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS Advocate - C.S.C. — WRIC/1476/2026
Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC010174572026
Filing Number
WRIC/
Filing Date
10-Jan-2026
Registration No
WRIC/1476/2026
Registration Date
14-Jan-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION ( 90900 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Last updated 03-Jul-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT, CHAUDHRY T.D.S. INTER COLLEGE
Adv. SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS Advocate - C.S.C.
-
2.SECRETARY, MADHYAMIK SHIKSHA PARISHAD
-
3.THE REGIONAL SECRETARY, REGIONAL OFFICE
-
4.DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOL
-
5.THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Case History
-
24-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-Apr-2026
—
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
-
06-Apr-2026
—
Vivek Saran
-
19-Feb-2026
Vivek SaranView PDF
Summary of WRIC/1476/2026 The petition challenges the rejection of Chaudhry T.D.S. Inter College's application to be an examination center for 2026 UP board exams. The court found the rejection order suffered from "total non-application of mind"—the redressal committee rejected the petition citing lack of student quota, but the original rejection was based solely on an SDM's recommendation not produced in evidence. The court directed the State to file the SDM report and ordered future committees pass reasoned orders addressing grievances raised. Case adjourned four weeks for further submissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Feb-2026
—
Vivek Saran
-
11-Feb-2026
Vivek SaranView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
—
Vivek Saran
-
05-Feb-2026
Vivek SaranView PDF
-
05-Feb-2026
—
Vivek Saran
-
29-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2026
Vivek SaranView PDF
-
10-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WRIC/1476/2026
Summary of WRIC/1476/2026 The petition challenges the rejection of Chaudhry T.D.S. Inter College's application to be an examination center for 2026 UP board exams. The court found the rejection order suffered from "total non-application of mind"—the redressal committee rejected the petition citing lack of student quota, but the original rejection was based solely on an SDM's recommendation not produced in evidence. The court directed the State to file the SDM report and ordered future committees pass reasoned orders addressing grievances raised. Case adjourned four weeks for further submissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts