JAMA KHAN AND OTHERS J.N. CHATURVEDI, ,BRIJESH KUMAR PANDEY vs STATE OF U.P. — CRLA/1826/1988

Case under Mandamus/act Not Mentioned Section NA. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.

Next hearing 22-Apr-2026

CNR: UPHC010170321988

Filing Number

CRLA/1826/1988

Filing Date

18-Aug-1988

Registration No

CRLA/1826/1988

Registration Date

18-Aug-1988

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )

Sub-Category

Judgment in the matter relating to any Act not covered in above categories. ( 88 )

Judicial Branch

Crl. Appeals

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Mandamus/act Not Mentioned Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAMA KHAN AND OTHERS J.N. CHATURVEDI, ,BRIJESH KUMAR PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P.

Case History

  1. 22-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    For Order

    Jai Prakash Tiwari

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    —

    Vani Ranjan Agrawal

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    —

    Deepak Verma

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    —

    Sanjay Kumar Pachori

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Sanjay Kumar PachoriView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad adjourned Criminal Appeal No. 1826 of 1988 (Jama Khan and Others v. State of U.P.) to March 10, 2026. The court directed the office to prepare the paper book along with a typed copy of oral evidence, as the existing evidence was not readable for judicial review. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 22-Jan-2026

    —

    Vani Ranjan Agrawal

  8. 15-Jan-2026

    —

    Vani Ranjan Agrawal

  9. 25-Nov-2025

    Vani Ranjan AgrawalView PDF

  10. 25-Nov-2025

    —

    Vani Ranjan Agrawal

  11. 07-Oct-2025

    Vani Ranjan AgrawalView PDF

  12. 07-Oct-2025

    —

    Subhash Chandra Sharma

  13. 23-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 18-Aug-1988

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/1826/1988

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad adjourned Criminal Appeal No. 1826 of 1988 (Jama Khan and Others v. State of U.P.) to March 10, 2026. The court directed the office to prepare the paper book along with a typed copy of oral evidence, as the existing evidence was not readable for judicial review. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case