COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT SARASWATI GYAN NIKUNJ BUDHANSAPUR AHMADPUR AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS — WRIC/858/2026
Disposed: -- on 23rd February 2026.
CNR: UPHC010121032026
Filing Number
WRIC/
Filing Date
08-Jan-2026
Registration No
WRIC/858/2026
Registration Date
09-Jan-2026
Judge
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
Coram
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
BASIC EDUCATION ( 90700 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Decision Date
23-Feb-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 03-Jul-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT SARASWATI GYAN NIKUNJ BUDHANSAPUR AHMADPUR AND ANOTHER
Adv. R. K. SINGH KAOSIK
-
2.MOHAN LAL SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
Adv. ,C.S.C. 1123
-
2.DISTRICT BASIC EDUCATION OFFICER
Adv. C.S.C.
-
3.BLOC EDUCATION OFFICER MUNGRA BADSHAHPUR
Adv. C.S.C.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Feb-2026
—
Vivek Saran
-
18-Feb-2026
Vivek SaranView PDF
The Allahabad High Court found procedural irregularities in the District Magistrate's inquiry against Saraswati Gyan Nikunj school, which allegedly operated at an unauthorized location despite recognition elsewhere. The court criticized the inclusion of a police officer in the inquiry committee and noted the petitioner was not afforded a proper hearing opportunity. The court directed the District Magistrate to file an affidavit explaining the committee composition and closure procedure, with personal appearance required if unsatisfactory, and adjourned the matter to February 23, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Feb-2026
—
Vivek Saran
-
10-Feb-2026
Vivek SaranView PDF
-
10-Feb-2026
—
Anish Kumar Gupta
-
03-Feb-2026
—
Vivek Saran
-
27-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jan-2026
Vivek SaranView PDF
-
08-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WRIC/858/2026
The Allahabad High Court found procedural irregularities in the District Magistrate's inquiry against Saraswati Gyan Nikunj school, which allegedly operated at an unauthorized location despite recognition elsewhere. The court criticized the inclusion of a police officer in the inquiry committee and noted the petitioner was not afforded a proper hearing opportunity. The court directed the District Magistrate to file an affidavit explaining the committee composition and closure procedure, with personal appearance required if unsatisfactory, and adjourned the matter to February 23, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts