ASIF QAZI vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — CRLA/877/2026
Case under Actquaries Act Section 3(2)(va),72-3(2)(va). Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC010115812026
Filing Number
CRLA/
Filing Date
08-Jan-2026
Registration No
CRLA/877/2026
Registration Date
22-Jan-2026
Judge
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
Coram
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )
Sub-Category
Appeal under provision of of 14 (A) (2) of SC/ST against Bail orders allowing or rejecting the bail applications by the SC /ST Special Court ( Exclusive Special Courts) (Minor Bail category) ( 17 )
Judicial Branch
Crl. Appeals
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASIF QAZI
Adv. RAFEEK AHMAD KHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.
-
2.SRI VIPIN ANURAGI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF
The High Court of Allahabad allowed Asif Qazi's criminal appeal and granted him bail in an SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act case, finding his role similar to co-accused persons already released on bail by the Court. The court set aside the lower court's bail rejection order and released him on personal bond with two sureties, subject to standard conditions including non-tampering with evidence and witness protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
11-Mar-2026
—
Manoj Bajaj
-
25-Feb-2026
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jan-2026
Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF
-
08-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLA/877/2026
The High Court of Allahabad allowed Asif Qazi's criminal appeal and granted him bail in an SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act case, finding his role similar to co-accused persons already released on bail by the Court. The court set aside the lower court's bail rejection order and released him on personal bond with two sureties, subject to standard conditions including non-tampering with evidence and witness protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts