SMT RACHNA PANDEY vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA529/517/2026
Case under Advocates Act Section 125,10-125. Disposed: -- on 09th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC010115032026
Filing Number
NA529/
Filing Date
08-Jan-2026
Registration No
NA529/517/2026
Registration Date
04-Feb-2026
Judge
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
Coram
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION U/S 483 Cr.P.C. ( 401600 )
Sub-Category
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION U/S 483 Cr.P.C. ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT RACHNA PANDEY
Adv. SARVENDRA DWIVEDI,DHEERAJ KUMAR PANDEY,DHEERAJ KUMAR PANDEY, ,DHEERAJ KUMAR PANDEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.
-
2.MANISH KUMAR PANDEY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
09-Feb-2026
Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF
The High Court of Allahabad admitted the possibility of settlement and directed notice to the private opposite party through the Chief Judicial Magistrate. The court adjourned the case to March 9, 2026, requiring all parties to appear in person and mandating the A.G.A. to communicate the order through the concerned police station. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. NA529/517/2026
The High Court of Allahabad admitted the possibility of settlement and directed notice to the private opposite party through the Chief Judicial Magistrate. The court adjourned the case to March 9, 2026, requiring all parties to appear in person and mandating the A.G.A. to communicate the order through the concerned police station. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts