DURGA SHAILENDRA SINGH, ,KANDARP DWIVEDI,SHARAD KUMAR PURWAR,S.K.SHUKLA vs IV A.S.J. BANDA AND OTHERS — CRLP/4676/2000
Disposed: --Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated) on 05th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC010109352000
Filing Number
CRLP/4676/2000
Filing Date
04-Aug-2000
Registration No
CRLP/4676/2000
Registration Date
04-Aug-2000
Judge
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
Coram
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WRIT PETITION NOT COVERED UNDER AFORESAID HEADS ( 159900 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal WRITS
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DURGA SHAILENDRA SINGH, ,KANDARP DWIVEDI,SHARAD KUMAR PURWAR,S.K.SHUKLA
Respondent(s)
-
1.IV A.S.J. BANDA AND OTHERS
Adv. VINOD SINGH,BIRENDRA SINGH 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Krishna Swaroop Dhar Dwivedi Senior Registrar (J)(Conf.)View PDF
The High Court of Allahabad dismissed petitioner Durga's writ petition challenging orders requiring removal of an encroachment from a public way. The court found no illegality in the lower courts' decisions, as the Magistrate's evidence-based conclusion that Durga encroached on public land (rather than private property) was sound, and affirmed both the original order and the dismissal of the criminal revision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
For Order
Deepak Verma
-
13-Apr-2026
For Order
Avnish Saxena
-
11-Feb-2026
Avnish SaxenaView PDF
-
03-Feb-2026
For Order
Avnish Saxena
-
22-Jan-2026
Revoked
Avnish Saxena
-
02-Jul-2013
Disposed
Mohammad Tahir
-
06-Aug-2000
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Aug-2000
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/4676/2000
The High Court of Allahabad dismissed petitioner Durga's writ petition challenging orders requiring removal of an encroachment from a public way. The court found no illegality in the lower courts' decisions, as the Magistrate's evidence-based conclusion that Durga encroached on public land (rather than private property) was sound, and affirmed both the original order and the dismissal of the criminal revision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts