RAJDEV vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS — WPIL/37/2026
Disposed: -- on 20th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC010108932026
Filing Number
WPIL/
Filing Date
08-Jan-2026
Registration No
WPIL/37/2026
Registration Date
08-Jan-2026
Judge
Kunal Ravi Singh
Coram
Kunal Ravi Singh
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
THE U.P.Z.A. & L.R. ACT 1950 ( 110100 )
Sub-Category
PIL relating to Gaon Sabha land ( 64 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Decision Date
20-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 03-Jul-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJDEV
Adv. BASANT KUMAR CHAUHAN,ARCHANA CHAUHAN,ARCHANA CHAUHAN, ,ARCHANA CHAUHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
Adv. ,BHUPENDRA KUMAR TRIPATHI,C.S.C. 1123
-
2.SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE
Adv. C.S.C. BHUPENDRA KUMAR TRIPATHI
-
3.TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL-SAIDPUR
Adv. C.S.C. BHUPENDRA KUMAR TRIPATHI
-
4.SATYADEV YADAV
Adv. C.S.C. BHUPENDRA KUMAR TRIPATHI
-
5.GAON SABHA, VILLAGE SARSARI PARGAN AND TEHSIL-SAIDPUR
Adv. C.S.C. BHUPENDRA KUMAR TRIPATHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Mar-2026
—
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
13-Mar-2026
—
Dr. Y. K. Srivastava
-
27-Feb-2026
—
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
16-Feb-2026
Chandra Kumar RaiView PDF
The High Court of Allahabad, in this interim order dated February 16, 2026, adjourned the PIL to February 27, 2026 for fresh hearing. The court directed petitioner's counsel to file a supplementary affidavit with annexures referencing specific orders mentioned in the khatauni (land record) document. No substantive decision was rendered on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Feb-2026
—
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
09-Feb-2026
—
Chandra Kumar Rai
-
02-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jan-2026
Siddharth NandanView PDF
-
08-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPIL/37/2026
The High Court of Allahabad, in this interim order dated February 16, 2026, adjourned the PIL to February 27, 2026 for fresh hearing. The court directed petitioner's counsel to file a supplementary affidavit with annexures referencing specific orders mentioned in the khatauni (land record) document. No substantive decision was rendered on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts