GYAN SINGH S.K. YADAV vs STATE OF U.P. — CRLA/3328/1984

Next hearing: 25th May 2026.

Next hearing 25-May-2026

CNR: UPHC010053901984

Filing Number

CRLA/3328/1984

Filing Date

03-Dec-1984

Registration No

CRLA/3328/1984

Registration Date

03-Dec-1984

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )

Sub-Category

Judgment in the matter relating to any other office mentioned in Indian Penal Code not covered in above categories. ( 85 )

Judicial Branch

Crl. Appeals

Last updated 26-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GYAN SINGH S.K. YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P.

Case History

  1. 25-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-May-2026

    —

    Saurabh Srivastava

  3. 06-May-2026

    —

    Saurabh Srivastava

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    —

    Saurabh Srivastava

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Saurabh SrivastavaView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLA 3328/1984 The High Court of Allahabad found that appellant Gyan Singh was not residing at the address on record, as reported by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mainpuri. The court issued notice to the appellant's surety through the CJM and adjourned the matter to 29.04.2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    —

    Sanjay Kumar Pachori

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    —

    Sanjay Kumar Pachori

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Sanjay Kumar PachoriView PDF

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    —

    Sanjay Kumar Pachori

  10. 13-Jan-2026

    Sanjay Kumar PachoriView PDF

  11. 24-Jul-2025

    —

    Siddharth

  12. 17-Jul-2025

    —

    Siddharth

  13. 05-Nov-2016

    —

    No Tied Up

  14. 05-Dec-1984

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 03-Dec-1984

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/3328/1984

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLA 3328/1984 The High Court of Allahabad found that appellant Gyan Singh was not residing at the address on record, as reported by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mainpuri. The court issued notice to the appellant's surety through the CJM and adjourned the matter to 29.04.2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case