RAJMAN S.C.TIWARI, MISS N.A.MOONIS vs DY. DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION AND OTHERS — WRIB/4269/1980

Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 04-Jan-2018

CNR: UPHC010053171980

Filing Number

WRIB/4269/1980

Filing Date

21-May-1980

Registration No

WRIB/4269/1980

Registration Date

21-May-1980

Judge

Manish Kumar Nigam

Coram

Manish Kumar Nigam

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONSOLIDATION OF HOLDINGS ( 100100 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 28-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJMAN S.C.TIWARI, MISS N.A.MOONIS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DY. DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION AND OTHERS

    Adv. ,VIVEK PRASAD MATHUR,P.C.SINGH,GOVIND SARAN,S.C. 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Manish Kumar NigamView PDF

    The Allahabad High Court dismissed the writ petition (WRIB 4269/1980) filed by Rajman and Miss N.A. Moonis against the Deputy Director of Consolidation for want of prosecution. Despite notice issued on 4.1.2018 to engage alternative counsel, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner, leading to dismissal. Any interim orders previously granted were vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Feb-2026

    Vikas Budhwar

  4. 12-Dec-2025

    Dr. Y. K. Srivastava

  5. 25-Aug-2025

    Ajay Bhanot

  6. 19-Aug-2025

    Saral Srivastava

  7. 15-Jul-2025

    Saral SrivastavaView PDF

  8. 15-Jul-2025

    Saral Srivastava

  9. 04-Jan-2018

    No Tied Up

  10. 23-May-1980

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 21-May-1980

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIB/4269/1980

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court dismissed the writ petition (WRIB 4269/1980) filed by Rajman and Miss N.A. Moonis against the Deputy Director of Consolidation for want of prosecution. Despite notice issued on 4.1.2018 to engage alternative counsel, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner, leading to dismissal. Any interim orders previously granted were vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case