K.P. SINGH AND OTHERS R.B. SAHAI, ,SANTOSH KUMAR YADAV vs STATE — CRLA/2786/1988

Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Dec-1988

CNR: UPHC010052911988

Filing Number

CRLA/2786/1988

Filing Date

06-Dec-1988

Registration No

CRLA/2786/1988

Registration Date

06-Dec-1988

Judge

Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)

Coram

Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )

Sub-Category

Criminal Appeal U/s 449 Cr. P.C. ( 89 )

Judicial Branch

Crl. Appeals

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K.P. SINGH AND OTHERS R.B. SAHAI, ,SANTOSH KUMAR YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

    The Allahabad High Court disposed of the criminal appeal challenging the 1988 forfeiture of surety bonds (Rs. 4,000 each) imposed on appellants K.P. Singh and Ram Pal. Since both appellants had already deposited the full fine amount and Ram Pal had died during appeal pendency, the court found no useful purpose in continuing proceedings and dismissed the appeal as moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Dec-2025

    For Order

    Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 18-Nov-2025

    Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

  5. 18-Nov-2025

    For Order

    Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)

  6. 13-Oct-2025

    Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

  7. 27-Nov-2018

    For Order

    Ravindra Nath Kakkar

  8. 17-Nov-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 06-Dec-1988

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/2786/1988

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court disposed of the criminal appeal challenging the 1988 forfeiture of surety bonds (Rs. 4,000 each) imposed on appellants K.P. Singh and Ram Pal. Since both appellants had already deposited the full fine amount and Ram Pal had died during appeal pendency, the court found no useful purpose in continuing proceedings and dismissed the appeal as moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case