CHOTEY SINGH AND OTHERS RAVINDRA SINGH, ,SUNIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA vs STATE OF U.P. — CRLA/315/1984
Next hearing: 13th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC010051451984
Filing Number
CRLA/315/1984
Filing Date
02-Feb-1984
Registration No
CRLA/315/1984
Registration Date
02-Feb-1984
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )
Sub-Category
Judgment in the matter relating to any other office mentioned in Indian Penal Code not covered in above categories. ( 85 )
Judicial Branch
Crl. Appeals
Last updated 26-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHOTEY SINGH AND OTHERS RAVINDRA SINGH, ,SUNIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P.
Case History
-
13-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-May-2026
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
06-May-2026
—
Abdul Shahid
-
31-Mar-2026
Abdul ShahidView PDF
Case Summary: CRLA 315/1984 The Allahabad High Court issued non-bailable warrants against appellants Naseeb Khan, Khajua, and Barey Lal. Upon their appearance/surrender before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, they shall be released on bail with the condition that they appear before the High Court on the next hearing date. The appeal was adjourned for four weeks with directions to the CJM to submit compliance and service reports. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Jul-2025
—
Siddharth
-
16-Jul-2025
—
Siddharth
-
25-Mar-2020
For Final Hearing/Disposal
Raj Beer Singh
-
11-Feb-2020
Raj Beer SinghView PDF
-
11-Feb-2020
For Order
Raj Beer Singh
-
04-Feb-2020
Raj Beer SinghView PDF
-
04-Feb-2020
For Order
Dinesh Kumar Singh-I
-
10-Dec-2019
Dinesh Kumar Singh-IView PDF
-
09-Dec-2019
For Order
Dinesh Kumar Singh-I
-
07-Jan-2016
For Order
No Tied Up
-
04-Feb-1984
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Feb-1984
Case filed
Registration No. CRLA/315/1984
Case Summary: CRLA 315/1984 The Allahabad High Court issued non-bailable warrants against appellants Naseeb Khan, Khajua, and Barey Lal. Upon their appearance/surrender before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, they shall be released on bail with the condition that they appear before the High Court on the next hearing date. The appeal was adjourned for four weeks with directions to the CJM to submit compliance and service reports. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts