RAMJAN MOHAMMAD vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/2939/2026

Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Feb-2026

CNR: UPHC010049662026

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

06-Jan-2026

Registration No

NA528/2939/2026

Registration Date

20-Jan-2026

Judge

Nand Prabha Shukla

Coram

Nand Prabha Shukla

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 482 Cr.P.C. order under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for maintenance ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMJAN MOHAMMAD

    Adv. ASHOK KUMAR SINGH,PREETI DWIVEDI,PREETI DWIVEDI, ,PREETI DWIVEDI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SHAHNAZ BANO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Nand Prabha ShuklaView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad set aside the Family Court's rejection of Ramjan Mohammad's recall application against an ex-parte maintenance order requiring him to pay Rs. 35,000 monthly to his wife Shahnaz Bano and their minor child. The court allowed the application in the interest of justice, subject to depositing Rs. 5,000 as cost, directing the lower court to rehear both parties and decide expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Nand Prabha Shukla

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    Nand Prabha Shukla

  5. 03-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/2939/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad set aside the Family Court's rejection of Ramjan Mohammad's recall application against an ex-parte maintenance order requiring him to pay Rs. 35,000 monthly to his wife Shahnaz Bano and their minor child. The court allowed the application in the interest of justice, subject to depositing Rs. 5,000 as cost, directing the lower court to rehear both parties and decide expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case