VAKIL SINGH AND OTHERS A.C. CHATURVEDI, ,PURUSHOTTAM DIXIT,SANJAY MISHRA vs STATE OF U.P. — CRLA/2899/1985

Next hearing: 13th May 2026.

Next hearing 13-May-2026

CNR: UPHC010049521985

Filing Number

CRLA/2899/1985

Filing Date

29-Oct-1985

Registration No

CRLA/2899/1985

Registration Date

29-Oct-1985

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )

Sub-Category

Judgment in the matter relating to any other office mentioned in Indian Penal Code not covered in above categories. ( 85 )

Judicial Branch

Crl. Appeals

Last updated 26-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VAKIL SINGH AND OTHERS A.C. CHATURVEDI, ,PURUSHOTTAM DIXIT,SANJAY MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P.

Case History

  1. 13-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-May-2026

    —

    Madan Pal Singh

  3. 06-May-2026

    —

    Abdul Shahid

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    Abdul ShahidView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLA 2899/1985 The Allahabad High Court issued non-bailable warrants against appellants Laiq Singh and Veer Singh for non-appearance. Upon their surrender before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, they shall be released on bail conditional to appearing before the High Court on the next date. The appeal was adjourned for four weeks with directions to file compliance reports. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 07-Jan-2026

    —

    Raj Beer Singh

  6. 17-Dec-2025

    For Hearing

    Raj Beer Singh

  7. 14-Nov-2025

    Raj Beer SinghView PDF

  8. 31-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Deepak Verma

  9. 03-Aug-2017

    For Hearing

    No Tied Up

  10. 31-Oct-1985

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 29-Oct-1985

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/2899/1985

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLA 2899/1985 The Allahabad High Court issued non-bailable warrants against appellants Laiq Singh and Veer Singh for non-appearance. Upon their surrender before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, they shall be released on bail conditional to appearing before the High Court on the next date. The appeal was adjourned for four weeks with directions to file compliance reports. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case