KHALIL AHMAD M.N. AGRAWAL, ,SANJAY SINGH vs STATE OF U.P. — CRLA/2711/1986

Disposed: -- on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 02-Jan-1987

CNR: UPHC010046161986

Filing Number

CRLA/2711/1986

Filing Date

31-Dec-1986

Registration No

CRLA/2711/1986

Registration Date

31-Dec-1986

Judge

Vani Ranjan Agrawal

Coram

Vani Ranjan Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )

Sub-Category

Judgment in the matter relating to any Act not covered in above categories. ( 88 )

Judicial Branch

Crl. Appeals

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KHALIL AHMAD M.N. AGRAWAL, ,SANJAY SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Vani Ranjan AgrawalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLA 2711/1986 The High Court of Allahabad acquitted Khalil Ahmad, setting aside his conviction for illegal diesel storage under the U.P. Diesel Oil Control Order 1981. The court found critical gaps in prosecution evidence: no chemical analysis confirming the recovered substance was controlled petroleum product, failure to establish the appellant's exclusive possession of the location, absence of proof regarding intent to sell, and non-production of seized materials during trial. Applying the principle that guilt must be proven beyond reasonable doubt, the court held the evidence suffered from material inconsistencies and omissions, warranting acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    —

    Vani Ranjan Agrawal

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    For Order

    Avnish Saxena

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Avnish SaxenaView PDF

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    —

    Divesh Chandra Samant

  7. 12-Aug-2025

    —

    Subhash Chandra Sharma

  8. 22-Dec-2023

    For Order

    Ajay Bhanot

  9. 09-Nov-2023

    For Order

    Sanjay Kumar Pachori

  10. 04-Aug-2023

    For Order

    Sanjay Kumar Pachori

  11. 24-May-2023

    For Order

    Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi

  12. 18-Apr-2023

    For Order

    Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi

  13. 10-Apr-2023

    For Order

    Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi

  14. 03-Apr-2023

    For Order

    Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi

  15. 24-Mar-2023

    For Order

    Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi

  16. 17-Mar-2023

    For Order

    Om Prakash Tripathi

  17. 03-Mar-2023

    For Order

    Om Prakash Tripathi

  18. 24-Feb-2023

    For Order

    Om Prakash Tripathi

  19. 17-Feb-2023

    For Order

    Om Prakash Tripathi

  20. 10-Feb-2023

    For Order

    Om Prakash Tripathi

  21. 10-Feb-2023

    For Order

    Om Prakash Tripathi

  22. 03-Feb-2023

    For Order

    Om Prakash Tripathi

  23. 28-Jan-2023

    For Order

    Om Prakash Tripathi

  24. 20-Jan-2023

    For Order

    Om Prakash Tripathi

  25. 13-Jan-2023

    For Order

    Om Prakash Tripathi

  26. 06-Jan-2023

    For Order

    Ali Zamin

  27. 02-Jan-2023

    For Order

    Ali Zamin

  28. 19-Dec-2022

    For Order

    Ali Zamin

  29. 12-Dec-2022

    For Order

    Ali Zamin

  30. 09-Dec-2022

    For Order

    Ali Zamin

  31. 05-Dec-2022

    For Order

    Ali Zamin

  32. 29-Nov-2022

    For Order

    Ali Zamin

  33. 21-Nov-2022

    For Order

    Ali Zamin

  34. 15-Nov-2022

    For Order

    Ali Zamin

  35. 09-Nov-2022

    For Order

    Ali Zamin

  36. 03-Nov-2022

    For Order

    Ali Zamin

  37. 20-Oct-2022

    For Order

    Ali Zamin

  38. 13-Oct-2022

    For Order

    Ali Zamin

  39. 29-Sep-2022

    For Order

    Ali Zamin

  40. 22-Sep-2022

    For Order

    Mohd. Aslam

  41. 18-Aug-2022

    Mohd. AslamView PDF

  42. 04-Mar-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 31-Dec-1986

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/2711/1986

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLA 2711/1986 The High Court of Allahabad acquitted Khalil Ahmad, setting aside his conviction for illegal diesel storage under the U.P. Diesel Oil Control Order 1981. The court found critical gaps in prosecution evidence: no chemical analysis confirming the recovered substance was controlled petroleum product, failure to establish the appellant's exclusive possession of the location, absence of proof regarding intent to sell, and non-production of seized materials during trial. Applying the principle that guilt must be proven beyond reasonable doubt, the court held the evidence suffered from material inconsistencies and omissions, warranting acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case