PRATIMA KUSHWAHA vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/1703/2026
Case under Actquaries Act Section 3(1)s,72-3(1)s. Disposed: -- on 20th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC010045032026
Filing Number
NA528/
Filing Date
06-Jan-2026
Registration No
NA528/1703/2026
Registration Date
14-Jan-2026
Judge
Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar (J) (Criminal)
Coram
Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar (J) (Criminal)
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 482 Cr.P.C. order summoning accused in a complaint case without filing revision ( 23 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
20-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRATIMA KUSHWAHA
Adv. RAJ KUMAR PANDEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.
-
2.SHATRUHAN PRASAD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
—
Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar (J) (Criminal)
-
20-Mar-2026
—
Padam Narain Mishra
-
13-Mar-2026
As Fresh
Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar (J) (Criminal)
-
27-Feb-2026
As Fresh
Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar (J) (Criminal)
-
12-Feb-2026
Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar (J) (Criminal)View PDF
Case Summary: Pratima Kushwaha v. State of U.P. (NA528/1703/2026) Pratima Kushwaha sought to quash a summoning order in a complaint case filed against her by Shatrudhan Prasad under IPC sections 323, 504, 505 and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s). The court noted that while Prasad had filed an application after a 15-month delay and the Special Judge's recorded statements contained no SC/ST Act allegations, the High Court issued notice to the respondent for a substantive reply rather than deciding the matter, listing the case for 27.02.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Feb-2026
—
Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar (J) (Criminal)
-
05-Feb-2026
—
Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar (J) (Criminal)
-
29-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. NA528/1703/2026
Case Summary: Pratima Kushwaha v. State of U.P. (NA528/1703/2026) Pratima Kushwaha sought to quash a summoning order in a complaint case filed against her by Shatrudhan Prasad under IPC sections 323, 504, 505 and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s). The court noted that while Prasad had filed an application after a 15-month delay and the Special Judge's recorded statements contained no SC/ST Act allegations, the High Court issued notice to the respondent for a substantive reply rather than deciding the matter, listing the case for 27.02.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts