KHELA SINGH AND ANOTHER vs STATE — CRLA/2175/1985

Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 02-May-2017

CNR: UPHC010043021985

Filing Number

CRLA/2175/1985

Filing Date

21-Aug-1985

Registration No

CRLA/2175/1985

Registration Date

21-Aug-1985

Judge

Avnish Saxena

Coram

Avnish Saxena

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )

Sub-Category

Judgment in the matter relating to any other office mentioned in Indian Penal Code not covered in above categories. ( 85 )

Judicial Branch

Crl. Appeals

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 28-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KHELA SINGH AND ANOTHER

    Adv. V.B. RAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Avnish SaxenaView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad dismissed Criminal Appeal No. 2175/1985 as abated since both appellants had died without legal substitution—appellant Khela Singh passed away on 01.07.2022 and appellant Gatuwa on an earlier date approximately 20 years prior. With no record of substitution to continue the appeal, the court found it procedurally impossible to proceed and dismissed the appeal accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Feb-2026

    Vinod Diwakar

  4. 28-Jan-2026

    Padam Narain Mishra

  5. 19-Jan-2026

    Padam Narain Mishra

  6. 05-Dec-2025

    Padam Narain MishraView PDF

  7. 05-Dec-2025

    Padam Narain Mishra

  8. 07-Nov-2025

    Padam Narain MishraView PDF

  9. 31-Jul-2025

    Dinesh Pathak

  10. 02-May-2017

    No Tied Up

  11. 23-Aug-1985

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 21-Aug-1985

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/2175/1985

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad dismissed Criminal Appeal No. 2175/1985 as abated since both appellants had died without legal substitution—appellant Khela Singh passed away on 01.07.2022 and appellant Gatuwa on an earlier date approximately 20 years prior. With no record of substitution to continue the appeal, the court found it procedurally impossible to proceed and dismissed the appeal accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case