PARAS RAM AND ANOTHER V.K. BARMAN, ,PRATEEK DWIVEDI,ANURA SINGH,A.K. AWASTHI,A.N. MULLA,I.N. MULLA,V.C. TEWARI,V.M. ZAIDI vs STATE — CRLA/1879/1988

Disposed: -- on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 26-Aug-1988

CNR: UPHC010041221988

Filing Number

CRLA/1879/1988

Filing Date

26-Aug-1988

Registration No

CRLA/1879/1988

Registration Date

26-Aug-1988

Judge

Vani Ranjan Agrawal

Coram

Vani Ranjan Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )

Sub-Category

Judgment in the matter relating to any Act not covered in above categories. ( 88 )

Judicial Branch

Crl. Appeals

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARAS RAM AND ANOTHER V.K. BARMAN, ,PRATEEK DWIVEDI,ANURA SINGH,A.K. AWASTHI,A.N. MULLA,I.N. MULLA,V.C. TEWARI,V.M. ZAIDI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    —

    Vani Ranjan Agrawal

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Vani Ranjan AgrawalView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad disposed of Criminal Appeal No. 1879 of 1988 on the grounds that appellant Paras Ram had died (abating the appeal as to him) and appellant Ram Asraey had deposited the required surety amount, resulting in withdrawal of Section 446 Cr.P.C. proceedings against him, thereby rendering no fruitful purpose in maintaining the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 11-Dec-2025

    —

    Rajiv Lochan Shukla

  5. 04-Dec-2025

    —

    Saurabh Srivastava

  6. 19-Nov-2025

    Saurabh SrivastavaView PDF

  7. 12-Nov-2025

    —

    Saurabh Srivastava

  8. 28-Nov-2018

    For Order

    Ved Prakash Vaish

  9. 19-Nov-2018

    For Order

    Ved Prakash Vaish

  10. 13-Nov-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 26-Aug-1988

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/1879/1988

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad disposed of Criminal Appeal No. 1879 of 1988 on the grounds that appellant Paras Ram had died (abating the appeal as to him) and appellant Ram Asraey had deposited the required surety amount, resulting in withdrawal of Section 446 Cr.P.C. proceedings against him, thereby rendering no fruitful purpose in maintaining the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case