SUGRIV DAS AND OTHERS A.K. GAUR, ,ARPIT SRIVASTAVA,AKANKSHA GAUR vs STATE — CRLA/1814/1985
Disposed: -- on 08th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC010038321985
Filing Number
CRLA/1814/1985
Filing Date
31-Dec-1985
Registration No
CRLA/1814/1985
Registration Date
31-Dec-1985
Judge
Vivek Kumar Singh
Coram
Vivek Kumar Singh
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )
Sub-Category
Judgment in the matter relating to any other office mentioned in Indian Penal Code not covered in above categories. ( 85 )
Judicial Branch
Crl. Appeals
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 03-Jul-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUGRIV DAS AND OTHERS A.K. GAUR, ,ARPIT SRIVASTAVA,AKANKSHA GAUR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
—
Vivek Kumar Singh
-
01-May-2026
Vivek Kumar SinghView PDF
The Allahabad High Court dismissed the criminal appeal as abated against appellants Sugriv Das and Umaria Devi following their deaths as reported on 22.09.2025. The court reserved judgment on the remaining appellants while hearing arguments from counsel for both sides. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
—
Chawan Prakash
-
20-Mar-2026
—
Harvir Singh
-
24-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Deepak Verma
-
17-Feb-2026
Deepak VermaView PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
For Order
Deepak Verma
-
08-Dec-2025
Deepak VermaView PDF
-
12-Nov-2025
—
Anish Kumar Gupta
-
07-Oct-2025
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
23-Sep-2025
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
03-Sep-2025
Saurabh SrivastavaView PDF
-
03-Sep-2025
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
20-Aug-2025
Saurabh SrivastavaView PDF
-
08-Aug-2025
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
29-Jul-2025
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
10-Apr-2017
—
No Tied Up
-
02-Jan-1986
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Dec-1985
Case filed
Registration No. CRLA/1814/1985
The Allahabad High Court dismissed the criminal appeal as abated against appellants Sugriv Das and Umaria Devi following their deaths as reported on 22.09.2025. The court reserved judgment on the remaining appellants while hearing arguments from counsel for both sides. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts