RANJIT AND OTHERS GAJENDRA PRATAP, ,SUDHIR MEHROTRA vs STATE OF U.P. — CRLA/1050/1986

Next hearing: 29th April 2026.

Next hearing 29-Apr-2026

CNR: UPHC010023661986

Filing Number

CRLA/1050/1986

Filing Date

12-May-1986

Registration No

CRLA/1050/1986

Registration Date

12-May-1986

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )

Sub-Category

Judgment in the matter relating to any other office mentioned in Indian Penal Code not covered in above categories. ( 85 )

Judicial Branch

Crl. Appeals

Last updated 28-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RANJIT AND OTHERS GAJENDRA PRATAP, ,SUDHIR MEHROTRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P.

Case History

  1. 29-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    —

    Raj Beer Singh

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    —

    Raj Beer Singh

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Raj Beer SinghView PDF

    In Criminal Appeal No. 1050 of 1986, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad adjourned the case on March 18, 2026, with orders to prepare the paper book by photocopying and relist the matter for hearing on April 22, 2026. No substantive order on merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Raj Beer SinghView PDF

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    —

    Raj Beer Singh

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    —

    Vani Ranjan Agrawal

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    —

    Tarun Saxena

  9. 19-Dec-2025

    Tarun SaxenaView PDF

  10. 13-Oct-2025

    —

    Vikram D Chauhan

  11. 06-Oct-2025

    For Order

    Vikram D Chauhan

  12. 05-Aug-2025

    Vikram D ChauhanView PDF

  13. 12-Jan-2018

    For Order

    No Tied Up

  14. 14-May-1986

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 12-May-1986

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/1050/1986

casestatus.in Summary

In Criminal Appeal No. 1050 of 1986, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad adjourned the case on March 18, 2026, with orders to prepare the paper book by photocopying and relist the matter for hearing on April 22, 2026. No substantive order on merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case