MANDEEP SINGH vs STATE OF U.P. — BAIL/225/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 468,43-468. Disposed: -- on 24th February 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Jan-2026

CNR: UPHC010004642026

Filing Number

BAIL/

Filing Date

03-Jan-2026

Registration No

BAIL/225/2026

Registration Date

05-Jan-2026

Judge

Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

Coram

Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (minor) ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

24-Feb-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 468,43-468

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANDEEP SINGH

    Adv. DEV KANT TRIGUNAIT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P.

    Adv. ,APURVA HAJELA,G.A. 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Feb-2026

    Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

  3. 20-Feb-2026

    Arun Kumar Singh DeshwalView PDF

    The Allahabad High Court adjourned Mandeep Singh's bail application (BAIL/225/2026) to February 24, 2026, after addressing procedural irregularities. A typographical error caused the hearing notice to show February 20 instead of 24, leading to an unnecessary appearance by the applicant's relative; the court accepted an apology for unauthorized case mention and exempted further personal appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Arun Kumar Singh DeshwalView PDF

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

  8. 03-Feb-2026

    Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

  9. 27-Jan-2026

    Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

  10. 16-Jan-2026

    Arun Kumar Singh DeshwalView PDF

  11. 16-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 03-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BAIL/225/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court adjourned Mandeep Singh's bail application (BAIL/225/2026) to February 24, 2026, after addressing procedural irregularities. A typographical error caused the hearing notice to show February 20 instead of 24, leading to an unnecessary appearance by the applicant's relative; the court accepted an apology for unauthorized case mention and exempted further personal appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case