M/S JAGRAN PRAKASHAN LIMITED vs State of U.P. AND 4 OTHERS — WRIC/378/2019
Case under Industrial Disputes Act Section NG. Disposed: --Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated) on 18th February 2026.
CNR: UPHC010002672019
Filing Number
WRIC/210/2019
Filing Date
02-Jan-2019
Registration No
WRIC/378/2019
Registration Date
05-Jan-2019
Judge
Arun Kumar
Coram
Arun Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
U.P. INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT 1947 ( 25100 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Decision Date
18-Feb-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S JAGRAN PRAKASHAN LIMITED
Adv. CHANDRA BHAN GUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
Adv. ,VIJAY PRAKASH MISHRA 1123
-
2.LABOUR COMMISSIONER LUCKNOW
-
3.DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER KANPUR REGION KANPUR
-
4.LABOUR COURT IV U.P. SARVODAYA NAGAR KANPUR
-
5.RAJENDRA KUMAR VERMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Jun-2026
—
Vivek Saran
-
22-May-2026
—
Vinod Diwakar
-
27-Mar-2026
—
Arun Kumar
-
19-Mar-2026
Arun KumarView PDF
The Allahabad High Court issued a procedural order in the writ petition filed by M/S Jagran Prakashan Limited against the State of U.P. and others. The court identified a conflict of interest where respondent no.5's counsel had been appointed as Standing Counsel for the State Government and directed fresh notices be issued to respondent no.5 to engage different counsel. The case was adjourned for four weeks for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Feb-2026
—
Arun Kumar
-
11-Feb-2026
—
Arun Kumar
-
04-Feb-2026
—
Arun Kumar
-
28-Jan-2026
—
Arun Kumar
-
09-Jan-2026
—
Arun Kumar
-
06-Nov-2025
—
Arun Kumar
-
21-Aug-2025
—
Prakash Padia
-
27-May-2025
For Admission
Prakash Padia
-
07-Apr-2025
For Admission
Prakash Padia
-
01-Apr-2025
—
Prakash Padia
-
24-Mar-2025
For Admission
Vikram D Chauhan
-
27-Feb-2025
Vikram D ChauhanView PDF
-
27-Feb-2025
Revoked
Vikram D Chauhan
-
10-Aug-2021
Suneet KumarView PDF
-
28-Jul-2021
For Admission
Suneet Kumar
-
07-Apr-2021
For Admission
Ajit Kumar
-
24-Mar-2021
For Admission
Ajit Kumar
-
04-Jan-2021
For Admission
J.J. Munir
-
28-Feb-2020
For Admission
Ashok Kumar
-
04-Feb-2020
For Admission
Manoj Kumar Gupta
-
22-Nov-2019
For Admission
Dr. Y. K. Srivastava
-
15-Nov-2019
For Admission
Dr. Y. K. Srivastava
-
08-Nov-2019
For Admission
Dr. Y. K. Srivastava
-
30-Oct-2019
For Admission
Dr. Y. K. Srivastava
-
16-Oct-2019
For Admission
Dr. Y. K. Srivastava
-
30-Sep-2019
For Admission
Dr. Y. K. Srivastava
-
20-Sep-2019
For Admission
Dr. Y. K. Srivastava
-
13-Sep-2019
For Admission
Dr. Y. K. Srivastava
-
19-Aug-2019
For Admission
Dr. Y. K. Srivastava
-
31-Jul-2019
For Admission
Dr. Y. K. Srivastava
-
18-Jul-2019
For Admission
Dr. Y. K. Srivastava
-
04-Jul-2019
For Admission
J.J. Munir
-
23-May-2019
J.J. MunirView PDF
-
23-May-2019
For Admission
J.J. Munir
-
09-May-2019
J.J. MunirView PDF
-
09-May-2019
For Admission
J.J. Munir
-
25-Apr-2019
J.J. MunirView PDF
-
25-Apr-2019
For Admission
J.J. Munir
-
24-Apr-2019
J.J. MunirView PDF
-
24-Apr-2019
For Admission
J.J. Munir
-
23-Apr-2019
J.J. MunirView PDF
-
23-Apr-2019
For Admission
J.J. Munir
-
16-Apr-2019
J.J. MunirView PDF
-
16-Apr-2019
For Admission
J.J. Munir
-
10-Apr-2019
For Admission
J.J. Munir
-
09-Apr-2019
J.J. MunirView PDF
-
09-Apr-2019
For Admission
J.J. Munir
-
29-Mar-2019
J.J. MunirView PDF
-
29-Mar-2019
For Admission
B.amit Sthalekar
-
14-Mar-2019
B.amit SthalekarView PDF
-
20-Feb-2019
For Admission
Saumitra Dayal Singh
-
08-Jan-2019
Saumitra Dayal SinghView PDF
-
08-Jan-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Jan-2019
Case filed
Registration No. WRIC/378/2019
The Allahabad High Court issued a procedural order in the writ petition filed by M/S Jagran Prakashan Limited against the State of U.P. and others. The court identified a conflict of interest where respondent no.5's counsel had been appointed as Standing Counsel for the State Government and directed fresh notices be issued to respondent no.5 to engage different counsel. The case was adjourned for four weeks for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts