ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.11 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 890/2017 SANHITA SENGUPTA @ SANHITA CHOWDHURY Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUBROTO GHOSH Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay) Date : 09/05/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. R.K. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Shekhar Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R No ground for transfer is made out. The Transfer Petition is accordingly dismissed. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. However, i n view of the decision rendered by this court on 9 th March, 2017 in T.P.(C) No. 1912 of 2014 titled Krishna Veni Nagam vs. Harish Nigam, it is open to the petitioner is at liberty to pray to the concerned court for participating in the proceedings by video conferencing and also to claim expenditure when petitioner(wife) is required to travel. In case she wants mediation, the court shall make endeavour in that direction too. (NEELAM GULATI) COURT MASTER (TAPAN KR. CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER
ÐITEM NO.14 COURT NO.11 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSTransfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 890/2017SANHITA SENGUPTA @ SANHITA CHOWDHURY Petitioner(s) VERSUSSUBROTO GHOSH Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for stay)Date : 09/05/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROYFor Petitioner(s) Mr. R.K. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Shekhar Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RNo ground for transfer is made out. The TransferPetition is accordingly dismissed. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposedof.However, i n view of the decision rendered by thiscourt on 9 th March, 2017 in T.P.(C) No. 1912 of 2014titled Krishna Veni Nagam vs. Harish Nigam, it is open tothe petitioner is at liberty to pray to the concernedcourt for participating in the proceedings by videoconferencing and also to claim expenditure whenpetitioner(wife) is required to travel. In case shewants mediation, the court shall make endeavour in thatdirection too. (NEELAM GULATI) COURT MASTER (TAPAN KR. CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER