ôITEM NO.5 Court No.8 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSTRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO(s). 411 OF 2010SHAIK BABY FLORENCE Petitioner(s) VERSUSSHAIKH SRIDHAR BABU Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay and office report ))Date: 29/11/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.S. SIRPURKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKURFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Namita Roy, Adv. Mr. Ujjawal Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Asit Kumar Rari, Adv. Mr. Gautam, Adv. Mrs Sarla Chandra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Dr. Madan Sharma, Adv. Ms. Aasha Upadhayay, Adv. Mr. R.D. Upadhyay,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The transfer petition is allowed in terms of the signed order. (Shashi Sareen) (Shashi Bala Vij) Court Master Court Master (Signed order is placed on the file) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION (C) NO. 411 OF 2010 SHAIK BABY FLORENCE ...PETITIONER VERSUS SHAIKH SRIDHAR BABU ...RESPONDENT O R D E R1. This transfer petition has been filed by the petitioner-
wife seeking transfer of S.M.A No. 12 of 2009 titled ShaikSridhar Babu Vs. Shaik Baby Florence from the court of learnedPrincipal Judge, Family Court, Dwarka, New Delhi to the FamilyCourt-cum-Additional District Judge , Guntur, Andhra Pradesh.2. We have heard learned counsel appearing for thepetitioner and gone through the petition.4. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case andlooking to the convenience of the wife, we deem it proper totransfer SMA No. 12 of 2009 titled Shaik Sridhar Babu Vs. ShaikBaby Florence from the court of learned Principal Judge, FamilyCourt, Dwarka, New Delhi to the learned District Judge, Guntur,Andhra Pradesh who may hear the petition either himself orassign the same for disposal to a court of competentjurisdiction. Ordered accordingly. The transferor court isdirected to send the record of this case immediately to thetransferee court. -2-5. The Transfer Petition is allowed accordingly.6. However, the respondent-husband, if he so chooses, mayfile an application for providing him personal security before theappropriate authority. ........................J. [ V.S. SIRPURKAR ] ........................J. [ T.S. THAKUR ] NEW DELHI NOVEMBER 29, 2010.
ITEM NO.48 COURT NO.8 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSTRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO(s). 411 OF 2010SHAIK BABY FLORENCE Petitioner(s) VERSUSSHAIKH SRIDHAR BABU Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay and office report )Date: 25/10/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.S. SIRPURKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKURFor Petitioner(s) Mrs. Namita Roy, Adv. for Mrs Sarla Chandra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. R.D. Upadhyay,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner seeking time to file rejoinder-affidavit, list this matter after four weeks. (Pardeep Kumar) (Shashi Bala Vij) Court Master Court Master
XITEM NO.78 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K. HANJURATRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO(s). 411 OF 2010SHAIK BABY FLORENCE Petitioner(s) VERSUSSHAIKH SRIDHAR BABU Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay and office report)Date: 25/08/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms. Namita Ray, Adv. Mr. Ujjwal Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Asit Kumar Rari, Adv. Mr. Gautam, Adv. Mrs Sarla Chandra,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner is present. Notice was issued to the sole respondent on12.5.2010. Neither A.D card nor unserved cover has beenreceived back so far. Await service of notice. List again on 22.9.2010. (M.K. HANJURA) REGISTRARrd
ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.8 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSTRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO(s). 411 OF 2010 (For Prel. Hearing)SHAIK BABY FLORENCE Petitioner(s) VERSUSSHAIKH SRIDHAR BABU Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for ex-Parte stay)Date: 03/05/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.S. SIRPURKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CYRIAC JOSEPHFor Petitioner(s) Mrs. Namita Roy, Adv. for Mrs Sarla Chandra,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice returnable in eight weeks. Further proceedings in divorce suit being SMA No. 12 of 2009, titled Shaik Shridhar Babu Vs. Shaik Baby Florence, pending before the learned Principal Judge, Family Court at Dwarka, New Delhi shall remain stayed until further orders. (Pardeep Kumar) (Shashi Bala Vij) Court Master Court Master