Home / Supreme Court / Diary 90379/1954

A. N. LAKSHMANA SHENOY v. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, ERNAKULAM &ANOTHER(and connected a

Supreme Court of India | Diary 90379/1954

Status

Judgment

Decided On

1958-04-28

Bench

DAS SUDHI RANJAN (CJ),AIYYAR T.L. VENKATARAMA,DAS S.K.,SARKAR A.K.,BOSE VIVIAN

Petitioner

A. N. LAKSHMANA SHENOY

Respondent

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, ERNAKULAM &ANOTHER(and connected a

Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 22

PETITIONER: A. N. LAKSHMANA SHENOY

Vs.

RESPONDENT: THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, ERNAKULAM &ANOTHER(and connected app

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/04/1958

BENCH: DAS, S.K. BENCH: DAS, S.K. BOSE, VIVIAN DAS, SUDHI RANJAN (CJ) AIYYAR, T.L. VENKATARAMA SARKAR, A.K.

CITATION: 1958 AIR 795 1959 SCR 751

ACT: Income Tax-Re-assessment-Original assessment under the Provisions of Travancore, Cochin and Mysore income-tax Acts- Constitutional changes resulting in Travancore and Cochin, and Mysore becoming Part B States-Extension of Indian income-tax Act to those States-- Applicability of the Travancore, Cochin and Mysore Income-tax Acts for re- assesment for Prior Period-Financial agreement between the President of India and the Rajpramukh- 96 752 Effect on re-assessment Proceedings-Travancore Income-tax Act, 1121 (Travancore XXIII Of 1121), s. 47-Cochin Income- tax Act, 1117 (Cochin VI Of 1117), s. 44 -Mysore Income-tax Act, 1923 (Mysore V Of 1923), s. 34-Finance Act, 1950 (XXV Of 1950), s. 13(1)Constitution of India, Arts. 278 and 295.

HEADNOTE: Section 13(1) of the Finance Act, 1950, provided If immediately before the 1st day of April, 1950, there is in force in any Part B State...... any law relating to income tax or supertax or tax on profits of busines...

Related

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India