http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 7
PETITIONER: BHATARAJU NAGESHW ARA RAO
Vs.
RESPONDENT: THE HON’BLE JUDGES OF THE MADRASHIGH COURT AND OTHERS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/12/1954
BENCH: DAS, SUDHI RANJAN BENCH: DAS, SUDHI RANJAN MUKHERJEA, B.K. BOSE, VIVIAN
CITATION: 1955 AIR 223 1955 SCR (1)1055
ACT: Procedure-Supreme Court-Suspension of Advocate by High Court-Appeal to Supreme Court-Respondents to be impleaded in such appeal-Indian Bar Councils act (XXXVIII of 1926), s. 12.
HEADNOTE: It is wrong and inappropriate to implead the Judges of the High Court as respondents in an appeal preferred to the Supreme Court by an Advocate against whom an order of suspension was passed by the High Court under s. 12 of the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926. In such appeal the proper respondents are the complainant if any, the Bar Council or Secretary thereof and the Advocato-General of the State concerned
JUDGMENT: CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 146 of 1954. Appeal by Special Leave from the Judgment and Order dated the 17th day of December, 1952, of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Referred Case No. 45 of 1952 arising out of the Report dated the 27th day of March, 1951, of the Court of District Judge, Krishna in C.M.P. No. 123 of 1951. S. P. Sinha, (K. R. Chaudhary and Sardar Bahadur, with him), for the appellant. R. Ganapathy Iyer and P, G. Gokhale, for respondent N...