IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2024 [arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 3633/2023]
SATHEESKUMAR Appellant
VERSUS
THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE Respondent
O R D E R
1. Leave granted.
2. The High Court by the impugned judgment and order dated 2nd March,
2021 has dismissed the appellant’s appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973. In the appeal, the appellant challenged his conviction
under Sections 361 and 363 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 as well as the order on
sentence whereby he was sentenced to seven years rigorous imprisonment.
3. We have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties and
perused the materials on record including the impugned judgment and order.
4. In our opinion, the High Court failed to consider the deposition of the
victim in course of her cross-examination in the proper perspective.
5. We are of the considered view that although the conviction recorded by
the trial court, since affirmed by the High Court, need not be interfered, the
appellant is indeed entitled to consideration of the sentence imposed on him.
6. We are also of the considered view that interest of justice would be
sufficiently served if the sentence is altered from seven years rigorous
imprisonment to the period of incarceration already undergone by the
appellant.
7. We fin...