1 CONMT.PET.(C) No. 801/2023
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION(CIVIL) No. 801/2023
IN
CIVIL APPEAL No. 872/2020
RAJESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA & ORS. PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
NARENDRA BHOOSAN & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)
ORDER
Heard Ms. Shashi Kiran, learned senior
counsel appearing for the petitioner(s) and Ms.
Garima Prashad, learned Senior Additional Advocate
General appearing for the respondent(s).
In terms of the impugned order dated
31.01.2020, in the case of Rajesh Kumar Srivastava,
the petitioners services with effect from
01.07.1986 till 31.05.2025 have been counted for
the purposes of award of pension on the basis of
the last salary drawn i.e. Rs. 42,800/-(Rupees
forty-two thousand eight hundred). This includes
the period for which the petitioners had worked on
work-charge basis.
In view of the fact that the services of the
petitioners for the period they have worked on
2 CONMT.PET.(C) No. 801/2023
work-charge basis has also been taken into account
in determining the pension amount, we find no good
reason to entertain this contempt petition. There
is no disobedience of the order dated 31.01.2020.
The present petition is, accordingly,
dismissed.
In case the petitioners have any subsisting
grievance regarding calculation or quantum of the
pension, the petitioners may take recourse to the
legal remedies, if any available to them in law.
Pending application(s), ...