1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) DIARY NO.7225 OF 2022
IN
WRIT PETITION (CRL.) NO.10 OF 2017
ABDUL GANI BHAT PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
CHIEF JUSTICE OF J AND K HIGH COURT RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R
On 06.11.2017, this Court had passed the following order:
“The present writ petition was filed by the petitioner in-person. This Court on 21st August, 2017, had passed the following order:
“Having heard the petitioner, who has appeared in person, we are of the view, that the petitioner is not in a position to express and canvass the legal position, emerging out of the pleadings of the case.
We accordingly consider it just and appropriate to appoint Ms. Preetika Dwived, Advocate as Amicus Curiae to assist the Court in the matter. The Registry is directed to furnish a complete set of writ petition to the learned Amicus Curiae, within one week from today.”
The Amicus Curiae was appointed in the matter as the pleadings and the arguments were not discernible.
We have heard Ms. Preetika Dwivedi, learned Amicus Curiae and Mr. Bharat Sangal, learned counsel appearing for the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir.
2
On a perusal of the assertions made in the writ petition, we find that more than 20 cases have been filed by the petitioner. We do not intend to comment on the said cases. However, we request ...