IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) DIARY NO.6944 OF 2024 IN
SLP (C) NOS.3778, 3779, 3780, 3783, 3784, 3788 & 3790 OF 2009 (@ SLP (C) NOS.3778-3790 OF 2009)
SURINDER KUMAR ETC. ETC. PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. RESPONDENT(S)
WITH
REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) DIARY NO.11060 OF 2024 IN
SLP (C) NOS.852, 853, 857 & 858 OF 2009 (@ SLP (C) NOS.852-861 OF 2009)
WITH
REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) DIARY NO.16885 OF 2024 IN
SLP (C) NO.3789 OF 2009 (@ SLP (C) NOS.3778-3790 OF 2009)
WITH
REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) DIARY NO.21663 OF 2024 IN
SLP (C) NOS.3793, 3794, 3795, 3796, 3797, 3798, 3800 & 3801 OF 2009 (@ SLP (C) NOS.3791-3801 OF 2009)
O R D E R
1. Applications seeking listing of the Review Petitions in Open
Court/Oral Hearing are rejected.
2. These petitions have been filed seeking review of the Order
dated 09.02.2009, whereby the Special Leave petitions preferred by
the petitioners were dismissed.
3. There is a huge delay of 5451, 1938, 5512 and 5567 days in
filing the Review Petitions.
1
4. we are not inclined to condone the delay. Hence, the Review
Petitions are dismissed on the ground of delay alone.
5. As a result, the pending interlocutory applications, including
applications for condonation of delay in setting aside
abatement/substitution, applications for substitution, applications
for setting aside abatement also stand dismissed.