Home / Supreme Court / Diary 60145/1957

LEO ROY FREY v. THE SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT JAIL,AMRITSAR, AND ANOTHER(an

Supreme Court of India | Diary 60145/1957

Status

Judgment

Decided On

1957-10-31

Bench

DAS SUDHI RANJAN (CJ),AIYYAR T.L. VENKATARAMA,DAS S.K.,SARKAR A.K.,BOSE VIVIAN

Petitioner

LEO ROY FREY

Respondent

THE SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT JAIL,AMRITSAR, AND ANOTHER(an

Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 5

PETITIONER: LEO ROY FREY

Vs.

RESPONDENT: THE SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT JAIL,AMRITSAR, AND ANOTHER(and

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 31/10/1957

BENCH: DAS, SUDHI RANJAN (CJ) BENCH: DAS, SUDHI RANJAN (CJ) AIYYAR, T.L. VENKATARAMA DAS, S.K. SARKAR, A.K. BOSE, VIVIAN

CITATION: 1958 AIR 119 1958 SCR 822

ACT: Sea Customs-Award of confiscation and Penalty-If a bar to prosecution for criminal conspiracy-Sea Customs Act, 1878 (VIII of 1878), ss. 167(8), 186-Indian Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860),s.120B-Constitution of India, Art. 20(2).

HEADNOTE: The petitioners were found guilty under s. 167(8) of the Sea Customs Act and the currency and other goods recovered from their possession were confiscated and heavy personal penalties imposed on them by the Collector of Central Excise and Land Customs. Complaints were thereafter lodged against them by the Customs authorities before the Additional District Magistrate under s. 120B of the Indian Penal Code, read with S. 23/23B of the Foreign Exchange Regulations Act, 1947, and s. i67(8i) of the Sea Customs Act, as also under other sections of the two latter Acts. The Magistrate granted bail but they could not furnish the requisite security and were, therefore, kept in judicial custody. By two petitions under Art. 32...

Related

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India