IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2024 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRIMINAL) NO. 3401 OF 2019)
N. VELLINGIRI & ANR. APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R
1. Leave granted.
2. Heard Mr. B Ragunath, learned counsel appearing for the
appellants. Also heard Mr. D. Kumanan, learned counsel appearing
for the State of Tamil Nadu.
3. Limited notice was issued in this case only on the quantum of
sentence. In support of his contention for reduction of sentence,
Mr. B Ragunath, learned counsel submits that the incident was on
spur of the moment, amongst family members. Moreover, it was a
minor dispute relating to a pathway amongst the disputing parties.
There are no other criminal antecedents of the appellants. It is
also submitted that the appellants were sentenced to nine months
imprisonment and they have been in custody for about ten days.
4. Mr. D. Kumanan, learned Government counsel on the other hand
submits that on account of assault by wooden log, the victim
suffered injuries and had to receive medical treatment.
5. Having considered the above circumstances in the present
matter and also looking at the fact that this was a one off
incident in the spur of moment and not a major matter, we deem it
appropriate to reduce the sentence to one month imprisonment, while
1
upholding the conviction under Section 325 IPC. The ...