1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION ………..D.NO.5463/2023 IN
D. No. 10069/2021
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPELLANT
VERSUS
VEENA MAHAJAN RESPONDENT
WITH
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION ………..D.NO.12592/2023 IN
D. No.10856/2022
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION ………..D.NO.14854/2023 IN. No.27819/2020
D. No.31968/2023
D. No.13254/2023 in D.No.20588/2019
D. No.14289/2023 in
C.A.No.8493/2016
D.No.20490/2023 IN
C.A.No.8564/2016
D.No.39310/2022 IN
C.A.No.8526/2016
D.No.6510/2023 IN
D.No.29149/2021
D.No.10561/2023 IN
D.No.14138/2022
D.No.22699/2023 IN
C.A.12249/2016
2
D.No.31028/2023 IN
C.A.8555/2016
D.No.37258/2023 IN
C.A.8632/2016
O R D E R
1. Delay condoned, and leave granted.
2. The applications for substitution are allowed, subject to all
just exceptions.
3. Learned senior counsel for the parties are ad idem that the
issue involved in the instant case squarely falls within the ambit
of our decision in Government of NCT of Delhi through its
Secretary, Land and Building Department & another vs. K.L. Rathi
Steels Limited and others, (2024) 7 SCC 315.
4. Consequently, the respondents-land owners shall be entitled to
compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency
in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 in
accordance with the procedure as explained in paragraph 128 of K.L.
Rathi (supra), which reads as ...