Home / Supreme Court / Diary 51/1950

THE STATE OF BOMBAY v. VIRKUMAR GULABCHAND SHAH

Supreme Court of India | Diary 51/1950

Status

Judgment

Decided On

1952-05-27

Bench

FAZAL ALI, SAIYID

Petitioner

THE STATE OF BOMBAY

Respondent

VIRKUMAR GULABCHAND SHAH

Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 8

PETITIONER: THE STATE OF BOMBAY

Vs.

RESPONDENT: VIRKUMAR GULABCHAND SHAH

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/05/1952

BENCH: FAZAL ALI, SAIYID BENCH: FAZAL ALI, SAIYID BOSE, VIVIAN

CITATION: 1952 AIR 335 1952 SCR 877 CITATOR INFO : D 1977 SC1027 (40) RF 1981 SC1485 (17,18) D 1982 SC 798 (10) R 1983 SC1015 (5) RF 1989 SC 644 (5)

ACT: Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act (XXIV of 1946), ss. 2(a), 17(2)--Spices (Forward Contracts Prohibi- tion) Order,1946, cls. 2, 3--Turmeric, whether "foodstuff"--Meaning of "foodstuff".

HEADNOTE: The term "foodstuff" is ambiguous. In one sense it has a narrow meaning and is limited to articles which are eaten as food for purposes of nutrition and nourishment and so would exclude condiments and spices such as yeast, salt, pepper, baking powder and turmeric. In a wider sense it includes everything that goes toto the preparation of food proper (as understood in the narrow sense) to make it more palatable and digestible. Whether the term is used in a particular statute in its wider or narrower sense cannot be answered in the abstract 878 but must be answered with due regard to the background and context. Turmeric is a "foodstuff" within the meaning of cl. (3) of the Spices (Forward Contract Prohibition) Order of 1944, read with s.2 (a)of the Essential S...

Related

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India