IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).13916-13917/2024
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
PRIDHVI ASSET RECONSTRUCTION AND SECURITIZATION (PARAS) COMPANY LTD. RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant.
Admittedly, there was a delay of 63 days in preferring the
appeal before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal. The
delay beyond 15 days could not have been condoned in view of the
proviso to sub-Section (2) of Section 61 of the Insolvency And
Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Hence, there is no merit in the Appeals and the same are
dismissed accordingly.
..........................J. (ABHAY S. OKA)
..........................J.
(PANKAJ MITHAL)
NEW DELHI; DECEMBER 13, 2024.
1
ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.5 SECTION XVII
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).13916-13917/2024
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
PRIDHVI ASSET RECONSTRUCTION AND SECURITIZATION (PARAS) COMPANY LTD. RESPONDENT(S)
(FOR ADMISSION) Date : 13-12-2024 These appeals were called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL
For Appellant(s) Mr. Dushyant Pa...