Home / Supreme Court / Diary 5/1956

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHAND OTHERS v. H. H. MAHARAJA BRIJENDRA SINGH.

Supreme Court of India | Diary 5/1956

Status

Judgment

Decided On

1960-08-26

Bench

DAS S.K.,KAPUR J.L.,SUBBARAO K.,HIDAYATULLAH M.,AYYANGAR N. RAJAGOPALA

Petitioner

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHAND OTHERS

Respondent

H. H. MAHARAJA BRIJENDRA SINGH.

Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 5

PETITIONER: THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHAND OTHERS

Vs.

RESPONDENT: H. H. MAHARAJA BRIJENDRA SINGH.

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26/08/1960

BENCH: KAPUR, J.L. BENCH: KAPUR, J.L. DAS, S.K. SUBBARAO, K. HIDAYATULLAH, M. AYYANGAR, N. RAJAGOPALA

CITATION: 1961 AIR 14 1961 SCR (1) 363 CITATOR INFO : RF 1972 SC 425 (20) R 1984 SC1178 (13,15,16)

ACT: Land Acquisition-Statute contravening Provisions of Govern- ment of India Act-Subsequent inclusion in Ninth Schedule of Constitution-Constitutionality of--U. P. Land Acquisition (Rehabilitation of Refugees) Act, 1948 (U. P. XXVI of 1948), s. 11-Constitution India, Art. 31-B and Ninth Schedule-Constitution (Fourth Amendment) Act, 1955, s. 5.

HEADNOTE: The property of the respondent was acquired under the U. P. Land Acquisition (Rehabilitation of Refugees) Act, 1948. The respondent challenged the constitutionality of the Act by way of a writ petition and though the High Court dismissed the petition it held that the two provisos to s.11 of the Act were invalid as they offended S. 299(2) of the Government of India Act. Subsequently the Constitution (Fourth Amendment) Act, 1955, included the U. P. Act in the Ninth Schedule as item NO. 15. The appellant contended that the inclusion of the Act in the Ninth Schedule protected it under Art. 31-B of the Constitution from any challenge under s. 299(2) of ...

Related

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India