IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL No.4957 OF 2024 (Arising out of SLP(Criminal) No.14370 of 2024)
AJAY KUMAR YADAV ...APPELLANT(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF BIHAR ...RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R
1. Leave granted.
2. The appellant is aggrieved by the order dated
11.09.2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna
in Criminal Miscellaneous No.63349 of 2024, to the extent
of imposing condition that the appellant – accused shall
furnish bail bonds after five months from the date of the
impugned order.
3. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
4. We are indeed surprised, as to how such a condition
could be imposed by the Court while granting bail to the
appellant – accused. It goes without saying that if the
Court is satisfied that the application for bail deserves
to be allowed, the Court could have imposed conditions as
mentioned in Section 437(3) Cr.P.C or such condition that
may be necessary in the interest of justice.
5. However, in the instant case, while granting bail,
the High Court has directed the appellant to furnish the
1
bail bonds after five months and that too without assigning
any reason, meaning thereby, on one hand, the appellant is
directed to be released on bail, however, he would be
released only after five months on his furnishing bail
bonds. Such a condition of bail is not only unwarranted
but is also not legally permi...