IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
INHERENT JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (C) DIARY NO.44843 OF 2024
IN
CIVIL APPEAL NOS.9059-9061 OF 2022
V S PALANIVEL …REVIEW PETITIONER/ ORIGINAL APPELLANT
versus
P SHRIRAM AND ANR. …RESPONDENTS
O R D E R
DIPANKAR DATTA & AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, JJ.
We have carefully gone through the defective1 review petition(s) and
connected papers.
2. By means of the instant petition(s), the original appellant seeks review of
the Judgment dated 28.08.2024 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Judgment’)
rendered in Civil Appeals No.9059-9061 of 20222. The Civil Appeals were
allowed in part.
3. We have reminded ourselves of the width and amplitude of review
jurisdiction, as noted in A S Raghavendra v Bharti Airtel Limited, 2024 SCC
OnLine SC 3121.
1 See Office Report dated 25.11.2024. 2 2024 INSC 659 | 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2413.
4. Having perused the (i) Judgment, (ii) the grounds urged in the review,
and; (iii) the grounds urged in the Civil Appeals, on a comparison, we find that
the grounds urged in review are identical to the grounds urged in support of
the Civil Appeals. In this eventuate, it is clear that all points taken to press the
Civil Appeals have been considered in the Judgment. The same cannot be re-
agitated herein.
5. In this view of the matter, no case for review is made out. Accordingly,
these petitio...