Home / Supreme Court / Diary 41/1952

KSHETRA MOHAN-SANNYASICHARAN SADHUKHAN v. COMMISSIONER OF EXCESS PROFITS TAX,WEST BANGAL

Supreme Court of India | Diary 41/1952

Status

Judgment

Decided On

1953-10-20

Bench

SASTRI M. PATANJALI (CJ),DAS SUDHI RANJAN,BOSE VIVIAN,HASAN GHULAM,BHAGWATI NATWARLAL H.

Petitioner

KSHETRA MOHAN-SANNYASICHARAN SADHUKHAN

Respondent

COMMISSIONER OF EXCESS PROFITS TAX,WEST BANGAL

Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 6

PETITIONER: KSHETRA MOHAN-SANNYASICHARAN SADHUKHAN

Vs.

RESPONDENT: COMMISSIONER OF EXCESS PROFITS TAX,WEST BANGAL

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 20/10/1953

BENCH: DAS, SUDHI RANJAN BENCH: DAS, SUDHI RANJAN SASTRI, M. PATANJALI (CJ) BOSE, VIVIAN HASAN, GHULAM BHAGWATI, NATWARLAL H.

CITATION: 1953 AIR 516 1954 SCR 268 CITATOR INFO : R 1960 SC1147 (9) R 1966 SC 24 (11) RF 1970 SC1343 (14) R 1972 SC2315 (13)

ACT: Excess Profits Tax Act (XV of 1940), s. 8(1)- Partnership, between kartas of two Hindu undivided families- Death of kartas-Partnership continued by sons-Nature of such pertnership-Separation of members of each branch-Whether effects change in constitution of firm-Carry forward of deficiencies.

HEADNOTE: Though a partnership entered into by the kartas of two Hindu undivided families is popularly described as one between two Hindu undivided families, in the eye of the law it is a part nership between the two kartas, and the other members of the family do not ipso facto become partners. It is open to the in dividual members of a Hindu undivided family to enter into a partnership with the individual members of another Hindu undivided family but in such a case it cannot be called a partnership between two Hindu undivided families. (1) (1937] 5 I.T.R. 202. (2) [1939]7 I,T.R. 195. (3) [1952] 22 I.T...

Related

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India