http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 5
PETITIONER: GANPAT RAI HIRALAL AND ANOTHER
Vs.
RESPONDENT: AGGARWAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE LTD.MURARI LAL HARI RAMV.MARWAR
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 24/10/1952
BENCH: AIYAR, N. CHANDRASEKHARA BENCH: AIYAR, N. CHANDRASEKHARA MAHAJAN, MEHR CHAND BHAGWATI, NATWARLAL H.
CITATION: 1952 AIR 409 1953 SCR 752 CITATOR INFO : E 1957 SC 540 (21) R 1963 SC 221 (8)
ACT: Pepsu Ordinance (X of 2005), ss. 52,116-Patiala States Judi- cature Farman, 1999--Appeal from order of single Judge- Certificate of fitness-When necessary-Order made before Ordinance came into force-Petition for amendment thereafter- Appeal from order dismissing petition-Necessity of certificate-Right of appeal--Vested right-Effect of change of law.
HEADNOTE: Section 116 of the Pepsu Ordinance X of 2005 (1948-1949) is a transitory regulation providing for a change over of proceedings ’from one set of courts in the covenanting State to others of like status in the Union, and for their continuance etc. in the latter courts. It does not mean that the proceedings must be treated as having freshly commenced. What is contemplated in the latter part of the section is a notional commencement, and the section means that all rights which arose or are likely to arise in future shall remain intact not with standing the new set Lip and that they would be dealt with by the Union co...