IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
INHERENT JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NOS. OF 2024 (@ Diary No. 394/2024)
IN CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4998-5000 OF 2012
PRIYANKA RANI PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
ADJUTANT GENERAL’S INTEGRATED HEADQUARTERS OF MINISTRY OF DEFENCE (ARMY) & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R
The present review petitions are defective. Despite the
defects being communicated to the counsel for the petitioner, the
same have not yet been cured.
As per the review petitioner, she was two years of age on the
date of adoption, that is, on 09.10.1989. Even if we accept this
as correct, looking at other facts and circumstances of the case,
no ground for review of the order dated 20.11.2023 is made out.
The review petitions are, accordingly, dismissed.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
.....................J. (SANJIV KHANNA)
.....................J. (S.V.N. BHATTI)
NEW DELHI; JULY 31, 2024.
ITEM NO.1005 SECTION XVII
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NOS. OF 2024 (@ Diary No. 394/2024)
IN CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4998-5000 OF 2012
PRIYANKA RANI PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
ADJUTANT GENERAL’S INTEGRATED HEADQUARTERS OF MINISTRY OF DEFENCE (ARMY) & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)
(FOR ADMISSION) Date : 31-07-2024 This matter was circulated to...