1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.__________ OF 2024 [ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO.12319 OF 2024]
NEHA MEHROTRA APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R
1. Leave granted.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant and
learned counsel appearing for the second respondent.
3. The appellant (wife) and the second respondent
(husband) entered into a Settlement Agreement dated 10th
March, 2021 (Annexure ‘P-2’). In view of the Settlement
Agreement, by the order dated 18th November, 2021, the High
Court proceeded to quash the criminal proceedings.
According to the appellant, the second respondent did not
comply with the terms and conditions incorporated in the
Settlement Agreement. Therefore, an application for recall
2
of the order dated 18th November, 2021 was made by the
appellant. By the impugned order, the said application was
rejected.
4. Our attention is invited to various clauses in the
Settlement Agreement including Clause 4. Today, an amount
of Rs.31,60,000/-(Rupees Thirty One Lakhs Sixty Thousand
Only) has been paid by the second respondent to the
appellant by handing over a demand draft dated 15th
October, 2024 bearing No.990947 drawn on Yes Bank by the
Advocate for the second respondent to the appellant who is
personally p...