IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S).4723-4725 OF 2024 (ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (CRIMINAL) NO(S).11676-11678/2024)
ISLAM ETC. APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
Leave granted.
The bail granted to the appellants by the Sessions Court under
various orders has been cancelled by the impugned order dated
7th August, 2024. It is not the case of the State or the private
respondent that after the appellants were enlarged on bail, they
have either tampered with the prosecution evidence or have
threatened the prosecution witnesses. Admittedly, there is no
complaint filed against the appellants from the date on which the
bail was granted that they have tried to pressurize the prosecution
witnesses or have tampered with the prosecution evidence. The
impugned order was stayed by this Court on 30th August, 2024. It is
not the case made out by the respondents that even thereafter, the
appellants have misused the facility of bail.
The contention of the learned counsel appearing for the second
respondent is that the second appellant (Tajuddin) has registered a
First Information Report against the brother of the victim. That
is no ground to cancel the bail.
Therefore, the impugned order dated 7th August, 202...