IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. /2024 (@SLP (C) No. 23721/2022)
CHINU RANI GHOSH APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
SUBHASH GHOSH & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R
Leave granted.
2. Being aggrieved by the judgment dated 28.04.2022 passed in
Regular First Appeal No.5/2021 by the High Court of Judicature at
Tripura by which the First Appeal arising out of a preliminary
judgment and preliminary decree dated 20.02.2021 and 23.02.2021
respectively, in TS(Partition) 13 of 2018 passed by the Court of
the Civil Judge(Senior Division), Udaipur, Gomati District, Tripura
holding that the execution of the Will (Ext.C) had not been proved
and thus the plaintiffs and defendants were equally entitled to
1/6th share of the subject matter of Schedules B(i) and B(ii) land
has been reversed by the High Court and the said Regular First
Appeal has been allowed, plaintiff No.3/appellant in the said suit
has preferred this appeal.
3. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that one Kariram
Ghosh had two sons namely, Tarani Ghosh and Nabin Chandra Ghosh.
Tarini Ghosh, Nabin Chandra Ghosh and Kanaki Bala Ghosh (wife of
Nabin Chandra Ghosh) were allotted certain land by the State
Government which was divided by way of a compromise as Schedule A,
1
Schedule B (i), and Schedule B(ii) respectively. One of the
brothers, Nabin Chandra Ghose, who w...