1
ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.4 SECTION II-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 13036/2024
[Arising out of impugned judgment and order dated 27-06-2024 in BA No. 3799/2024 passed by the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi]
SHAMU TOPP Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Respondent(s)
(IA No. 207047/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No. 207048/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date : 25-11-2024 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kumar Shivam, AOR Mr. Sanjeet Nayak, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Rajiv Singh, A.A.G. Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Standing Counsel, Adv. Ms. Madhusmita Bora, AOR Mr. Pawan Kishore Singh, Adv. Mr. Dipankar Singh, Adv. Mrs. Anupama Sharma, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Heard Mr. Kumar Shivam, learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner.
2. Adverting to the State’s counter affidavit, Ms. Madhusmita
Bora, the learned counsel submits that 28 out of 43 witnesses have
already been testified. As next the independent witnesses to give
their evidence, the counsel submits that the bail at this stage
2
should not be favourably considered.
3. As the next date for examination of witne...